On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:24:40PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I think we already dropped F21 and earlier, right? I think F22 is > > pretty obvious. Long tail aside, our upgrade update has been pretty > > awesome recently, and I'm I'm leaning towards F23 as well, making the > > policy simply "N through N-2". [...] > The main thing is that those people are just checking.. and aren't > getting any updates so they are just as happy getting them from 8 > servers or 100 servers. Yes some people may be asking for 'new' > packages for those systems but they are pretty much already all > there. I don't see much bonus for having the mirrors wanting to cover > us drop because we are over 1 TB of data in our what we want people > to mirror. Especially as our disk usage may go up with flatpacks and > other image formats. Makes sense. The above proposal is pretty aggressive, basically keeping a release for ~6 months after EOL, which I think makes sense because we support upgrades from N-2. This way, updates will be available for users of F24 who want to update before upgrading to F26 can do that all the way through the F27 release. I'm willing to be convinced that this isn't significant enough to even bother with, though, and that we should be even more aggressive and just archive all EOL releases. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
