Re: OpenShift plans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/2017 01:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:> The next steps are:
> 
> * Make sure our plan for managing apps/routers/etc will work. Basically
> we thought we would check in .json configs in ansible and then have it
> run os commands loading those. We need a app using that method to
> confirm it works as we expect. I think relrod was going to try and do
> that with waverdb or modernpaste, but we should confirm, he might have
> been working on the non config part of this. ;)

I'm ready to move the-new-hotness over. Is the expectation that I
deliver a JSON file that defines my project as part of a request for
resources ticket?

Are we going to disable editing in the web UI and only let changes get
applied by hand-editing the JSON and pushing that with Ansible? I'm not
necessarily objecting to that approach, I'm just curious.

Would it be better for us to have web editing privileges and use the
staging instance to tune our configurations in an OpenShift configured
the same way the production instance will be, then export those for
production, or are we better off all having development OpenShift
instances for that? We'll need to all be careful to run the same version
as stg/production since it sounds like this JSON isn't particularly
well-documented, nor is there any schema or validation tools.


-- 
Jeremy Cline
XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx
IRC:  jcline

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux