On 14 November 2016 at 17:05, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That is the data point I wanted. > > What, you didn't think I was actively engaged with Jim right through > this entire process? > I am not supposed to assume anything. When I do assume something it seems to lead to ruin. Whether I can communicate that clearly seems not to be possible today. > So is that now a +1? It is a +1. It was a +0 before which meant not to hold it up but reservations. > >> On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> If I might, I'd very much like to see this move sooner rather than later. x86_64 builds don't wait, I'm not sure why this one should. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> >> -- >> Stephen J Smoogen. >> _______________________________________________ >> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx