On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:06:46 +0200 Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:26:28PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This one I am not sure about how best to handle. > > > > If we simply apply this and run it we have the modified service > > files still around. Perhaps we could do this in 2 steps? Replace > > the service file with the one from the package, then after > > everyplace is updated, remove that? > > > Or I suppose we could reinstall the package, but that might cause > > other issues. > > > > kevin > > IIRC, the config in /usr is less prioritary than the one in /etc, so > keeping the old one in /usr should not cause any issues, and will > solve itself with next package upgrade or reinstallation of the > server. > > Since that's for fedmsg-gateway, i suspect that we will one day > commit code to it and upgrade anyway. Well, I don't like the idea of the machines being in a state thats not described by the playbooks. Sure, it will go back on upgrade, just rubs me the wrong way. ;) kevin
Attachment:
pgpXPcMnPhZ7S.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
