On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:07:30PM -0600, Luke Macken wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:32:42PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:22:04PM -0600, Luke Macken wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to push out a production bodhi upgrade, along with some ansible > > > changes that will change the permissions of how the masher is run. > > > > > > The latest bodhi code contains a number of fairly important bug fixes, > > > and a couple of minor enhancements: > > > > > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/compare/2.1.7...develop > > > > > > The backend masher changes that are in ansible will hopefully provide a > > > huge speedup in terms of how long it takes to mash the updates > > > repositories. The changes for this involve running the fedmsg-hub as the > > > apache user, and changing the ownership of /mnt/koji/mash/{atomic,updates} accordingly. > > > > > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=94608f070d2f61bf518ab27cec2e2ef0cc29f964 > > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=9889ac7446a8de92019cc3b5f39893b1d91a20a7 > > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=afbfecbbd765c184b155f4e713442fc954dffa84 > > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=5b252344eeacdf9b05cd58feb227dee73d2c1112 > > > > > > I tested the bodhi & db upgrades in staging, and performed limited > > > testing of the masher due to various constraints. > > > > How easy would it be to revert if needed? And will you be available tomorrow and > > this week-end if something goes south? (I seem to remember tomorrow is a day > > off). > > Reverting will be fairly easy, and yes I will be available tomorrow and > this weekend. > > I'll have a production db snapshot ready just in-case the alembic > migration fails. I've tested it in stg with the prod snapshots many > times already. > > If the masher aspect fails, it'll be simple to re-chown things back to > the way they were and revert the ansible changes. +1 for me as well then, thanks for answering :) Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
