On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:36:00 +0100 Jan Kurik <jkurik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I was not aware of a need for a new FAS. Do we have a summary of the > new functionality or requirements FAS3 should implement ? > I do not need to now, I am just curious :) Well, fas2 is using rhel6 and frameworks we no longer use or want to support, so mostly fas3 was a re-write in a framework we support and adding a collection of features we wanted. We really need to figure out what we want to do here and get fas3 deployed. It's been sitting for a while now. ;( kevin
Attachment:
pgp8rCRJfEM3J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
