Unfortunately I don't have answers, otherwise I would already provide suggestions ;) Isn't this the right time to ask Fedora Design Team [1] who is more qualified then me to provide some guidance on this topics? Vít [1] https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/newticket Dne 2.9.2015 v 14:20 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:30:21PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Not directly related to this particular update, but >> >> 1) Why there is "Actions" section? Is the Timeline/Anitya some action? > Because I couldn't think of another title? > Suggestions? Extra? Others? > No idea... > >> 2) Why the "Anitya" is in actions? Why it is not part of monitoring? > Because it's not about if the package is being monitored it's about if the > package is present in anitya. > The monitoring section only indicates the monitoring status. Having the anitya > button in there could make it more confusing as for one it is not an option but > a pop-up getting info from anitya to tell you how things are looking for this > package in anitya. > >> 3) "Monitoring" points to >> "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring";, why Koschei >> integration links to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei ? Link to wiki >> possibly gives the chance to understand what "Monitoring" actually means >> and what "Anitya" actually is, so that is probably the better option. >> "Actions" is just text. Actually I don't mind either way, but it should be >> consistent at minimum. > I have no problem changing that link. Where do you think it should go then? > > > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
