On Fri, 29 May 2015 09:15:39 -0400 (EDT) Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Kevin. > > > > > We created a homepage for the Fedora Bootstrap project we're > > > hosting on the OS1 cloud VM and we'd like to request a well > > > looking domain name for the web URL. > > > > Well, there's some issues there in my mind I'm afraid. :( > > > > Fedora Infrastructure has permissions to brand/call things using the > > Fedora trademark, granted by the Fedora Board (Now Fedora Council). > > > > However, you are running this service, not us, so I am not sure we > > can put it in the fedoraproject.org domain. Additionally, people > > will see 'fedoraproject.org' and come to us about it and we will > > have no idea how to manage or fix it. > > > > > We believe the 'bootstrap.fedoraproject.org' is > > > the most suitable and easy to remember name. The current FQDN is > > > vm-107-179-132-209.osop.rhcloud.com (pointing at 209.132.179.107) > > > and we've requested a change to fedora-bootstrap.osop.rhcloud.com > > > in the OS1 tracker (should be configured tonight) so that you > > > could create a CNAME record if needed. We expect the server could > > > be under a heavy network load soon as it offers rootfs snapshots > > > and therefore it isn't wise to do proxying. Please, let me know > > > if you need any additional data. > > > > Yes, I would. ;) > > > > In addition to the trademark stuff: > > > > * This looks neat! I think it will be a great help for bringing up > > new arches and possibly also letting us do better mass rebuilds. > > > > * Is there some place we can see the code ? > > Here: > https://github.com/ahs3/bootstrap > > I've put the link to the main page. However, the page still > requires tweaks. We've created a request for authorized project > logo that needs to be in place prior making the page public. Just as a side note there's another popular project using that name also: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap Might be confusing to some folks. > > * How far along are you? I see there's 6 stages listed on the web > > page... > > We currently have scripts for the first 4 stages, but the testsuite > only supports the first stage at the moment. The rest stages will be > implemented continually. ok. > > > * I see koji listed there, is that the fedora koji? Or your own? > > Or ? > > We plan to run our own testing koji hub, but we're not there yet. > The most difficult thing is to find a suitable hardware and sufficient > storage space for rootfs snapshots in order to provide maintainers > with pre-built environments, etc. Our requirements are 'huge' and > I'm happy I was able to find acceptable builders for all the listed > architectures. We're still waiting for NFS storage for the s390 > builder and the cloud storage has only 200 GB for the snapshots. But, > better than nothing. Step by step. Sure. > > * There might be some overlap here with the koschei project. It only > > does scratch builds however, and you likely need buildroots, but > > there could be a lot of the koschei logic re-used especially if > > this is a koji interfacing project. > > I'm aware of the koschei project and keeping it in mind. ok. Just wanted to mention it. > > * Are you planning on continuing to host it where it is, or is the > > idea that it would be something we would want to run in fedora > > infrastructure? > > I'm not against running it anywhere if it suits our needs. > > > I'm sure there will be other questions, but thats a good start. ;) > > Sure. Don't hesitate to ask. kevin
Attachment:
pgpOseGZTl4bM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
