Re: Preferred database / SQL variant for infra?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:07:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 18:29:24 +0200
> Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Is there also any aversion to any abstraction layers such as unixODBC
> > in particular or that is acceptable if an application doesn't have
> > direct PostgreSQL client code?
> 
> Yes postgres. The only two things we have left that use mysql/mariadb
> are paste and wiki and we are migrating the wiki away soon. ;) 
> (Of course qa has some mariadb so we won't be done with it, but at
> least we will be somewhat reduced). 
> 
> Most of our applications use sqlalchemy and alembec. 

Correct, but a spelling correction: it is 'alembic' (for schema
migrations).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux