Re: Request for setroubleshoot-server be installed by default in Fedora Infra

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not sure it's a good idea to add more always running daemons.  But
> could be the right move to install it by default on staging boxes.

I was under the impression that it was refactored a while back to not
always run as it did in the RHEL5-ish time frame, but instead be
spawned as needed via dbus messages. I could be mistaken but thought
I'd mention that both 'systemctl list-units' and 'systemctl
list-unit-files' do not list an entry for setroubleshoot and there
doesn't appear to be an init script listed in /etc/init.d/ either.

I'd be perfectly happy if it was just in the staging environment but
wanted to point that out.

Thanks,
-AdamM

>
> -Toshio
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Adam Miller
> <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>     I was recently trying to dig into a selinux denial issue in stage
>> koji and noticed that the setroubleshoot-server package was not
>> installed. This provides some things that make troubleshooting selinux
>> pretty easy as outlined in dwalsh's blog post[0] and it doesn't appear
>> to pull in much in the way of dependencies.
>>
>> $ sudo yum install setroubleshoot-server
>> Password+Token:
>> builder-infrastructure
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> epel
>>                        | 4.4 kB  00:00:00
>> infrastructure
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> rhel7-base
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> rhel7-dvd
>>                        | 4.1 kB  00:00:00
>> rhel7-extras
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> rhel7-ha
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> rhel7-optional
>>                        | 2.9 kB  00:00:00
>> infrastructure/7Server/x86_64/primary_db
>>                        | 151 kB  00:00:00
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package setroubleshoot-server.x86_64 0:3.2.17-4.1.el7_1 will be installed
>> --> Processing Dependency: systemd-python >= 206-1 for package:
>> setroubleshoot-server-3.2.17-4.1.el7_1.x86_64
>> --> Processing Dependency: setroubleshoot-plugins >= 3.0.14 for
>> package: setroubleshoot-server-3.2.17-4.1.el7_1.x86_64
>> --> Processing Dependency: pygobject2 for package:
>> setroubleshoot-server-3.2.17-4.1.el7_1.x86_64
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package pygobject2.x86_64 0:2.28.6-11.el7 will be installed
>> ---> Package setroubleshoot-plugins.noarch 0:3.0.59-1.el7 will be installed
>> ---> Package systemd-python.x86_64 0:208-20.el7_1.2 will be installed
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>
>> Dependencies Resolved
>>
>> =====================================================================================================================
>>  Package                             Arch                Version
>>                 Repository               Size
>> =====================================================================================================================
>> Installing:
>>  setroubleshoot-server               x86_64
>> 3.2.17-4.1.el7_1              rhel7-base              342 k
>> Installing for dependencies:
>>  pygobject2                          x86_64              2.28.6-11.el7
>>                 rhel7-base              226 k
>>  setroubleshoot-plugins              noarch              3.0.59-1.el7
>>                 rhel7-base              586 k
>>  systemd-python                      x86_64
>> 208-20.el7_1.2                rhel7-base               90 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>> =====================================================================================================================
>> Install  1 Package (+3 Dependent packages)
>>
>> Total download size: 1.2 M
>> Installed size: 7.4 M
>>
>>
>> Just thought I'd throw it out there and see what others thought of it.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> -AdamM
>>
>> [0] - http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/65777.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list
>> infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux