On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:56:26 +0200 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/10/2015 06:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think it might be a good idea to have some swift space setup, but > > I am not sure what use cases we fully have for it, so I would say it > > should be somewhat small. 100GB or something? > > This would also be backed by the equalogics? Or would it be > > distributed on the nodes? > > Swift have built-in split/replica mechanism. So I think that with > this size, I can steal some space from vg_server of nodes. Yeah. Or perhaps somewhat bigger would make sense? 500G? > > Are there specific cases where live migrations would help us out a > > lot? > > I do not know. Cold migration last several minutes. I agree that we > can afford it. We are not bank or stock operator where every outage > cost pile of money. Yeah. The one place I thought might be nice was if we wanted to reboot a compute node to update it, but then I got to thinking, why shouldn't we also just reboot the instances too and update them as well? ;) kevin
Attachment:
pgpGYrTxxbk9V.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
