|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is the "Request new package" [1] now officially supported? Will there be some announcement? And will it work faster/automatically or is there still fallback to some manual action? And I have one additional RFE. Since there is referred bugzilla ticket, I believe that you should be able to get the "package name" and "summary" from that ticket summary. This would save me from copy-pasting. Vít [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/request/package/ Dne 23.3.2015 v 18:57 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have just released and pushed to staging a new pkgdb2 release: 1.24 >> Here is the changelog for this version: >> >> * Thu Mar 19 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.24-1 >> - Fix orphaning package having a group as PoC >> - Fix excluding provenpackager from some packages specified in the >> configuration >> - Monkey patch flask.jsonify to handle JSONP responses on GET requests (Ralph >> Bean) >> - Anitya integration >> - Allow package admins to retire a package >> >> >> Here below is the changelog for the versions that made it to stg but not prod >> (giving more info about the changes that are specific to stg). >> >> * Fri Feb 20 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.995-1 >> - Update to 1.23.995 (pre-release of 1.24) >> - Fix the link to `My Requests` on the API documentation page >> >> * Fri Feb 20 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.994-1 >> - Update to 1.23.994 (pre-release of 1.24) >> - Do not use insecure connection to pkgdb in set_monitoring_status (Till Maas) >> - Add documentation for the API endpoint to set the monitoring status of a >> package >> - Replace the monitoring toggle button by one that might be clearer >> - Fix actually setting the monitoring flag of new package to True (and adjust >> the tests for this) >> >> * Thu Feb 19 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.993-1 >> - Update to 1.23.993 (pre-release of 1.24) >> - Drop the package name from the URL to edit a request (fix few bugs in the >> process) >> - If requested is a package admin, request is set to Awaiting Review >> - Use secure=True against prod pkgdb in set_monitoring_status.py (Ralph Bean) >> >> * Wed Feb 18 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.992-1 >> - Update to 1.23.992 (pre-release for 1.24) >> - Add a `My Request` tab in the main menu >> - Adjust copyright year in the master template >> - Monitor package set as True by default (Ralph Bean) >> - Drop the branch from field when requesting branch for a package >> - Add the possibility to Edit one's request directly via the `My Requests` page >> - Increase the width of the field in the form to request a new package >> >> * Tue Feb 17 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.991-1 >> - Update to 1.23.991 (pre-release for 1.24) >> - Fix documentation to reflect the correct variable name >> - Add a link to the request made by someone on the user's page (where all the >> packages of that person are listed) >> - Simplify the form to request a package to be added to pkgdb >> - Ensure we check that a group is valid before giving it some ACLs >> - Make it easier to change one's avatar by simply clicking on it (Ralph Bean) >> - Add a placeholder for the Review URL field when requesting a package to be >> added to pkgdb >> - When giving watch* ACLs to a FAS user, check that this user exists >> - Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days >> period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to grant/deny >> the request, this period does not apply if the requester has approveacls on >> the package >> >> * Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.23.99-1 >> - Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24) >> - New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package directly >> in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla > > > 1.24 is now running in prod. > I have had to adjust some permissions at the DB level and hopefully I got them > all, but please do report if you run into an error 500. > > Thanks, > Pierre > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVERAsAAoJEAzgnueZF7h89hsP/RX3yxQblWr22Zmen0w5DXC3 tBpW60946QdDzUq2pLbRqq9rM3iqQiFsjbX4QzxXT8JXlwQO8kqjGNHwQlzuXLUW lX9B2J8RYnOPP9krDX3Y4MRZmhV4jL4lIZjXgAwCyrxH0avJZk2tykpIcgzgeXY+ HRuZ//r49FLXQ04ihMZfe5aN15Fqwp8caaZ0Q1QKS9Rqb9u0jRZPaWq74c/NSxvg N68bxaab2wxtGlZkt6CfakQkHybLyZ54uVK/CG2ulnuM0x59eTmHdCh/Hrlnscje rMinRSCdD1j+vn3dTZZmjIwcRla6F8H6KDa9vpuAEy/56zDTE4vYJuoJsusn2Dc8 GIlLC5YLXYSirBUmO9qh8IjywepvSaHN1JbiFj7Hb/vLDcBGHHcEOqPrQddEJE2x TkEcvtIIxl2OV+8Q2cIerdmcddKHFpeO+zX7lmfVUqjWFvjgn2/m73nOwXlhytFK T5rnAPHyONzjkecl61jdFh+1rBodbn+xQqkdCKT4nGhmhI9DvCAVcLBliVpd49Nm QLFP47FZewJV+eUYwSpyO1LP45W3iMUY9RTazgRR+6OiJTJIgiZOnIR4Sj7/heax TZm66TGcRe9rzNk/uZ32uqBE8jXF9q1Bu39Qsz8YaipKbc19GEcynPiNIkHDjB16 6dGsoXWxS3D5PFeGUlvz =RqWk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
