Re: Pkgdb2 1.24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 05:00:31PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:44:56AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:25:48 +0100
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Note2: As it will likely take a little time for people to get
> > > adjusted to the new workflow (that needs to be documented & so on),
> > > there will likely be a time for pkgdb admins and releng when they
> > > will have to check both bugzilla and pkgdb.
> > 
> > Right. However, we should be able to roll this out and keep using the
> > old process for new packages and branches right? ie, maintainers don't
> > even need to know this is there unless we ask them to try it?
> 
> Yes, since we do not touch bugzilla nor the way packages are created in pkgdb,
> the old process will work just fine.

This was my only concern.  Sounds good to me to deploy as soon as is
convenient.  We have just short of two weeks before freeze-time to fix
bugs that pop up, which seems like plenty.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux