On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:25:20 +0100 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > All thats set and I can see console in the web dash again just fine > > for any of the instances I tried, and they are all https using > > only. > > Works for me too. Nice. Thanks. Cool. > >> > I tried to automatize adding of SSH keys using this: > > I wonder if we shouldn't have something to update/upload everyones > > ssh keys. Might be handy but of course it's not a blocker/that > > important. We could even look at just tieing into our existing > > fedmsg listener (when someone with a cloud account changes ssh key, > > update the cloud). > > Done. Search for "upload SSH keys for users" action. > However it work only initially. Once user alter his password it will > fail. I ignore those cases with "ignore_errors: yes" though. > I have pending RFE for OpenStack so admin is able to upload ssh keys > to user. > > I skipped (commented out) users: > * twisted > * cockpit > as I do not know which ssh keys they use. Can somebody put there > right values? Will have to find out. Those groups aren't from fas... > >> > Anyway, I am able (again) to start VM and log to those VM. > > Me too. I uploaded the F22 Alpha cloud image and it worked fine. > > (aside cloud-init taking about 35 seconds to run. It seemed to be > > timing out on some metadata ?) > > > > We should look at hooking our cloud image upload service into this > > soon so we can get images as soon as they are done. > > I will leave this one for somebody else. Yeah, will ping oddshocks on it, but possibly wait until our final re-install. > > * Might be a good time to look at moving copr to f21? and builders > > also to be f21? (they should come up faster and in general be > > better than the el6 ones currently used, IMHO) > > I will start by moving builder to F21 (this really limit us) and once > it will be finished I move backend and fronted. I'm afraid that by > that time I will move them directly to F22 :) Hopefully we can get there before then. ;) > > * Right now ansible on lockbox01 is using euca2ools to manage cloud > > instances, perhaps we could/should just move to nova now? Or this > > could perhaps wait for us to move lockbox01 to rhel7. > > I learned (the hard way) that nova/cider/neutron etc. commands are > deprecated. The new preferred way is command "openstack" from > python-openstackclient. However Icehouse use 0.3 version and you > should not think about using this command unless you have 1.0 version > available (Juno or Kilo, not sure). It probably does not matter if > you use ansible modules, but you may consider it if you are calling > commands directly. #justsaying ok. We may have to do some trial and error. nova commands worked fine from here, but I didn't really try and do anything fancy. We could see if the euca stuff will just keep working for us for now. kevin
Attachment:
pgpNvAYtDEHJf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure