On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:27:59PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 23:09:03 +0100 > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Having progit.dev.fedoraproject and later maybe > > progit.fedoraproject.org would already help (I'd rather have .dev. > > than .cloud. in the url as I believe it is more indicative of the > > state of the application there). I am planning on blogging and > > calling for testers once I got around fixing what I still want to fix > > (unit-tests and finish the git integration for tickets, git > > integration for pull-request is on the roadmap but I won't wait for > > it before calling for testers). More people testing will likely also > > help finding out how usable the system is. > > Also very reasonable. > > It might be good to settle on a new name first? That way there's 'buzz' > about it and you don't have to change it after people know it. Yes, I clearly need to figure this out soon! > > Regarding progit, it will not grow a wiki feature but offers the > > possibility to have a doc repo containing text, html, markdown or > > rest files (the last two will be rendered, the first two display). > > I think that would actually meet the needs of the folks that are using > the trac wiki pretty nicely. Cool :) > > For the ticketing system, we currently have: > > Tags: > > Assigned: > > Blocking: > > Depends on: > > Status: > > So there won't be a roadmap as there is in trac, but this can be > > implemented using the Tags, issue dependency is in, as well as > > assigning issues. > > > > Do we need something else? > > Possibly some way to have sensitive/private tickets? http://209.132.184.222/progit/issue/49 > There may be some small number of people using the roadmap feature (ie, > mark 10 tickets for a milestone, when they are solved the release > happens, etc) I think this can be achieved with tags: http://209.132.184.222/progit/issues?tags=doc list the ticket opened and with this tag > Ability to mass modify tickets (so you could say "new release, please > retest your bug with this version") I'd consider this be part of the API > libravatar support. Already there: http://209.132.184.222/progit/blob/master/progit/__init__.py#_366 and http://209.132.184.222/progit/blob/master/progit/lib/__init__.py#_831 > Ability to 'watch' all tickets for a project, ie see all comments to a > list or list of addresses. http://209.132.184.222/progit/issue/50 > Templates for some kinds of requests? Not sure about this but: http://209.132.184.222/progit/issue/51 > Way to attach to tickets? I guess tho that could be done by PR's really > most of the time. Oh yeah, definitely :) http://209.132.184.222/progit/issue/52 This would also help to report problem with screenshot :) As for Ralph: http://209.132.184.222/progit/issue/53 Thanks all :) Feel free to drop in any tickets you like to comment or patch things :) Pierre
Attachment:
pgpi7frW6MdzA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
