Re: rhel6 -> rhel7 migrations status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:51:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I took a look at what rhel6 instances we have left and wrote up a
> little status report:  
[...]
> not too hard:·
> 
> These are the ones where we need a playbook written or where they are
> already in ansible, but we need to reinstall them with 7 and make sure
> all the needed packages for that application are available there. 
> 
> fas* (needs playbook

FAS2 is still TG1, so we will have the same problem here as we have for the
other TG1 application.
There is FAS3 in progress, so one option would be to wait for FAS3 to upgrade
the FAS servers to RHEL7. This would also put a little more pressure on us to
work on FAS3.

> ns* (needs playbook)
> secondary01 (needs playbook)
> virthosts (some need outage)
> sign-vaults (needs being careful)
> backup03 (needs outage and being careful)
> blockerbugs* (needs playbook)
> (all these are in ansible, just need reinstall for rhel7)
> (all these have multiple instances, so no outage hopefully)
> badges-web*
> download-rdu*
> github2fedmsg*
> notifs-web*
> packages*
> summershum*
> tagger*

> fedocal*

Done in stg and prod

> elections*
> nuancier*
> pkgdb*

Done in stg, will be done in prod after freeze

Missing: darkserver, I'll see with Kushal if/when/how we can do it.


Pierre

Attachment: pgpPNq67pvZEg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux