-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:21:21 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:20:06PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:37:44AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon > > > wrote: > > > > TODO: > > > > * Confirm location and dates with Matt > > > > * Confirm location and dates with Toshio > > > > -> I will email them > > > > > > Matt confirmed that he is planning on attending and will make his > > > own travel arrangements. > > > > > > Toshio isn't sure yet, should get back to me on this on Friday. > > > > > > If neither Toshio nor Xavier can make it, should we make the FAD > > > a little shorter and focused on MirrorManager2 only? > > > > This is a possibility. It might also be possible to have a "Plan B" > > application if the right people are present. Preferably this would > > be something on the Fedora.next critical path, so we get maximum > > value from the FAD event. > > Potential plan B: > - hackfest on the ansible migration > - hackfest on the el7 migration > - hackfest on atomic's infrastructure? > - ? > > > I wanted to raise two additional issues: > > > > (1) A budget is needed for this event very soon if the event will > > happen December 4-9. It's less than two months away, and flight > > costs are likely to rise imminently. The attendance roster and > > costs need to be finalized so the budget can be established and > > approved. > > Unless we replace some people in the current budget with others (with > different travel costs), we have probably an "upper limit" budget, > which could only go down if less people come or if we make it shorter. > > > (2) I'm not sure this timeframe will work well for Fedora release > > engineering. There is a release scheduled for December 2, and > > whether there's any further slip in the F21 release schedule, > > travel around this event would raise unnecessary challenges with > > the release. How vital is a rel-eng representative for > > MirrorManager hacking? > > I had added Dennis to the list of potential attendee because he > mentionned once to me wanted to the involved in the design of how > FAS3 generates the certs used to upload to the dist-git. > But if the FAS part does not happen, then I don't think there is much > interest for him to be involved in the MirrorManager part. > Dennis comes back to the US on Dec 2nd, so technically he would be > able to make it but that would be up to him. I am returning to the US on December 3rd not second I also am not in Chicago. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOzHbAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRaMEP/3Gr3mVFrPKWJi7NaCX/3pUO WaPBXhvLGPby2ljGcFUEvBNMoaAKVIwYAqjrZMdHGDkFowQVxvHNNKPBI89K5WNm rpBlNI/KuB5sclkilTLc4j7xc9jswEFJsW60fyX5CJVi5ctXzBYr6mVY386rmnUk WL6kmC08v/kmSlnhmGrgi8fUl0mLzR7QHHMHcXUtokGH0/b/BGpQX6rBV2btKFW/ /Gd2AuMsHeMeZhCfeuuznbPCpJnda0oZfj9z9LZR5NZkx4TfC7u4J+6/JbpcX+e4 htKGz+9HNkDZ6Nu/EfYpvxyTXXujdBfuV7c6Fkg/SPVwFJT3qi94nNlXNXONlKEJ CPd3efhl2dynUvqXQuilG6ZYWfS0dVk59fwPbLlSu70g3RnatTlfWIFFvAxXfnh0 A42PraSXTBoRXbPET7SMXyfaVjK1zQltVSE45xAbtxiMxATVbYs6Zs5vLzRnIYvz /xkzovPVW5VMHKU5ulGcs8NQbUnqvuJxe3BgFYkfsIwbBouOBM7yEf0xyVNVhPl4 IdPybKju7sTQEhILu8kNei4DosavS0KHtpg7tw8L8Eb+9ky7anCzVrZ17pmk4/h5 gsmfKMmQ2/idQXmgPkKm2v42uWeLSLg93BaodfWpGQx5GUPzElmImyX+8cq1tp+z OSCokLZIVfj/5wYeK5VV =eCeH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
