On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:23:00 +1000 Noriko Mizumoto <noriko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000 > > Noriko Mizumoto <noriko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > >> Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for > >> some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many > >> of translators have not subscribed infrastructure list? > > > > Thats fine with me for the most part, but one final question here: > > Kevin, no need to be final question, rather I like to hear any > concern of Infra. Sure. I meant one more that I can think of right now. ;) > I just do not wish to let any discussion go on and decision to be > made for this issue at Infra at lists without majority of translators. Absolutely. You are the folks using it. > > > > From the discussion it looks like moving to zanata is coming out > > as the best plan moving forward? > > Some packages have already used zanata, as well some fedora books > authors (docs team) have also used zanata. Therefore many of > translators are familiar with zanata than any other tool. I see a > number of people supporting zanata in this list as well trans at > lists. I will make sure that translators do reach the consensus on > this. Sounds good. > > If so, is that moving to an existing zanata instance that is being > > run for us? Or is that talking about fedora infrastructure creating > > such an instance? > > I've added this item in the list [1], and will keep you in the loop. ok. > > > > I'm fine with us moving to a hosted instance if translators and > > websites folks all agree that is the best way forward, but I am not > > really comfortable running our own instance. > > Let me ask a few things here. > Should we include websites team for discussion? Yes, it would be good to pull in them... it will mean some change in their processes. > You are saying 'not comfortable', does that mean not enough resource > on Infra team? Yeah, just off the top of my head: * We have 0 people with jboss experence * We have not planned any hardware for this, so we don't have anything ready this fiscal year for something like this. * Our normal requirements have anything we deploy be packaged for Fedora/EPEL, this could take a while if there's not already packaging for Zanata. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
