Hi Dimitris! I’m a little bit disappointed about this step, especially, since I’m quite sure there would have been other solutions. I hope you mean it serious, that you want to support the (large) Fedora community with a bigger plan for free! Else… Well… You know how important it is for us Fedora (and Red Hat) fellows that we’re building (on) F/LOSS! It has been and will always be. Therefore I do completely understand that some people on this list cry out loud now and ask for alternatives (although none come to my mind immediately). All the best to you and your business, Oliver From: infrastructure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:infrastructure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dimitris Glezos It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision from the Fedora part. I explained in detail the log & reasoning behind the decision to stop maintaining the open-source branch in the GitHub issue Rahul provided. In the meantime, the Transifex team is happy to be donating one of the bigger plans to Fedora for free (which supports sharing of teams, Transl. Memory and glossary between teams), and we'll continue to do so. -d On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version. Should we consider alternatives? Rahul
-- Dimitris Glezos _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
