On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:41:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > pkgdb > 07.09.52 pkgdb01.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 07:13:00 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry pkgdb configuration task_userid:root > 07.09.52 pkgdb01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 07:13:00 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry pkgdb configuration task_userid:root > 07.09.52 pkgdb02.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 07:13:01 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry pkgdb configuration task_userid:root [...] > nuancier > 06.35.07 nuancier01.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 06:37:38 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry nuancier configuration task_userid:root > 06.35.07 nuancier01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 06:37:38 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry nuancier configuration task_userid:root > 06.35.07 nuancier02.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 06:37:38 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry nuancier configuration task_userid:root > 06.35.07 nuancier02.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org Jun 30 2014 06:37:38 4 CHECK_DIFF:CHANGED copy sundry nuancier configuration task_userid:root These are "normal". Both application have an admin DB user and a regular DB user. What the playbook does is: - set up pkgdb/nuancier with the admin DB user - create the DB or create new tables, or nothing if it is all already there - update the configuration files to use the regular DB user so that this is the under-priviledge user used by the application in normal condition I guess we could: - Drop step 1 and 2 or - Make step 1 and 2 rely on a CLI argument Pierre
Attachment:
pgpFuDajg9J7E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
