Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:33:48 -0600
Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:45:23 -0600
> Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I've been working to rewrite and extend the script that we've been
> > using to control playbook execution for folks who are not in
> > sysadmin-main.
> > 
> > https://bitbucket.org/tflink/rbac-ansible
> 
> With the removal of the '-P' option, I think that all the concerns
> raised have been addressed.
> 
> Any objections to putting the script into place?

Nope. We can do so. ;) 

> If not, where should it live? I put it up on bitbucket because that
> was easy for me but I realize that none of the infra stuff lives
> there.

So, two options I see: 

a) we just put it in infra ansible. Although, twist there is that
lockbox01 is still under puppet, so we would need to put at least some
config under puppet. 

b) keep it at bitbucket, package it as an epel/fedora package and we
just install that and use it from the package. 

I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to package but on the other hand,
there may well be lots of ansible users who might like something like
that? 

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux