Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:13:00 -0600
Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've generally been using port 222 for real ssh on those hosts. We
> could set the port in the inventory file. While that would work for
> many cases, I've always used the -e directly for 2 reasons:
> 
> 1) My understanding is that ansible convention discourages putting
>    stuff like that in the inventory files

Well, it's a bit ugly, but should work I would think. 

> 2) Hosts are listening for ssh on port 22 when initially deployed.
>    Initial deployments would require changing the inventory
> information to use port 22 for initial deployment and then changing
> it back to the alternate port after running the playbook/role which
> sets up the alternate port for ssh.

True... a bit messy. 
 
> If that's the way that we want to go, we'll have some extra commits to
> the ansible repo but it'll work.

Yeah, I think a bit of messyness in the repo is better than having to
bother with -P in rbac-playbook... just to make it simplier. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux