> I've been thinking about a few ways we can clean up fedorahosted.org > and, after talking with Kevin, I think I've got a good enough draft > to let you guys give any input you might have. I've pasted the draft at > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/98687/ > > Drop your ideas in here and we'll add them to the list as we go. I'm > also in #fedora-admin and #fedora-noc as bwood09. Thanks for your > help! Hopefully we can have this hammered out quickly! > I looked over the document and nothing jumped up & down, begging for editing. <Two cents from a newbie> I think another condition for a "review" flag is missing / incomplete documentation. With solid documentation being a co-goal of the effort, I think it would help to build a list of projects needing more written up -- no matter how ugly-long it gets. Even if the project passes the review with flying colors, it could simply shift to a "needs documentation" list that can be worked from over time. (I've had to write a lot of stuff in the past, and am starting to get involved in more documentation with some recently-new job duties. I think having a To Do list will help direct where efforts should be concentrated / prioritized.) </Two cents from a newbie> ======================================================================= John M. Troan <jtroan@xxxxxxxxx> Maintainer: Football Site @ JT-SW.com http://www.jt-sw.com/football Chief of Computer Operations U.S.S. Kitty Hawk / NCC-1659 ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
