On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:28:37PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:48:00PM +0200, Michael scherer wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:19:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > The first patch here looks fine to me... but the second one isn't going > > > to work I don't think. > > > > > > Those services use memcached, but they use our existing memcached03/04 > > > instances that are still in puppet, not local memcached. > > > > Not all. > > Nuancier seems to use localhost : > > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/tree/roles/nuancier/templates/nuancier.cfg#n52 > > > > So does pkgdb : > > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/tree/roles/pkgdb2/templates/pkgdb2.cfg#n28 > > > > ( unless i missed something and pkgdb2 and nuancier run on a memcache server ) > > Nuancier and pkgdb2 could be moved, it's just a matter of adjusting the > configuration file. > pkgdb2 has memcache but iirc, it doesn't do much with it. I tried to speed up > some of the API calls with it but it wasn't really a clear win, so I'm not sure > it actually uses memcache at this time. I correct myself, pkgdb2 still uses memcache for its integration with FAS. Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
