On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > One of the frustrations of having multiple different lists is that we can't > really easily cross-post, because if people reply but aren't subscribed to > all lists, they get bounces, and the conversation ends up fragmented. Or the > alternative, multi-posting (same post individually to multiple lists), but > then you're _starting_ with fragmentation. but if if one can post but are not subscribed to a side list and the thread takes off there, a poster never sees it without wallowing through the archive (a pull vs push method) > I don't know enough of the mailman internals to know how this might be > implemented, butit seems like it must be doable. And there might be some > details to be worked out around removing people, and possible moderation. > But what do you think of the general idea? from memory there was formerly a 'wildcard to post' email list back in RHL days I am generally negative for the first listed reason. If a thread is important enough to cross post, it is easy enough for the poster thinking so to add a '-request' before the '@', and subscribe for a bit before posting. It is easy enough to reverse the process once the thread burns out. And is just might be that that new list turns out to be worth hanging around on, and cross-pollinating Burden one person once rather than confuse many people a lot, so to speak -1 as indicated -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
