On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 11:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:07:47 +0100 > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:06:30AM +1100, Graham Williamson wrote: > > > > There will likely be some overlap, but do you think we could generate > > a similar table for service rather than host. > > Like which applications remain to be port to ansible (bodhi is done, > > fedocal is done, fedmsg is done, glusterfs is done, but is > > mirrormanager?, fas?, koji?). Some of these updated. I will be able to finish this off this afternoon after work. > > > > Just an idea :) > > Yeah, I agree that an application table would be good. ;) > > Perhaps we can use https://apps.fedoraproject.org/ 's config to > generate this list and then update from there? Implemented. > > Some hosts also we will NOT be migrating. In particular the app > servers. Under our old model we had a pool of app servers that they ran > every app. The new model we are moving to is that each app has it's own > instances. This results in more instances at the end, but it means when > one app is having issues it likely won't affect other apps and we can > much more easily isolate what the problem is without the noise of all > the other apps in the mix. So, we can stick a "N/A" on all the app > servers. > > A few other notes: > > * openid* have been replaced by fedoauth* (already in ansible). > > * bvirthost02/03 have nothing on them and are going to be repurposed, > so they can be dropped from the list. Changes updated. > > great stuff... thanks for working on it. > > kevin > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
