Re: How tickets are resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:05:57 +0100
Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> 
> > I have suggestion.
> > Can we please put into tickets how they have been resolved?
> > I mean something else then "Fixed".
> > 
> > Something like:
> >   Fixed - puppet.git commit abc123
> > or
> >   Fixed - I run command "rm foo.bar"
> > 
> > This way people (and apprentice group especially) can learn how
> > infra set up works. And if ticket need to be reopened (or audited)
> > later, you can easily what was really done.
> > 
> > I can understand exceptions in complicated tickets, but usually it
> > is just few commits and one or few more commands. Isn't it?
> 
> IMHO it is always good to at least shortly explain what happened. Not
> only in tickets but also in IRC.

Yeah. I'm happy to try and start being more verbose where possible and
ask others to do the same. 

In some cases it may well not be however. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux