Re: areas where we can invest in automation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:33:22 -0400,
  Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was asked (with my Red Hat hat on) to put together a little report on
areas in Fedora which could be improved with an investment in better
automation. From what I'm working on myself, I'm aware of the gigantic need
in the cloud images production process, and I've been keeping an eye on Tim
Flink's autoqa revamp ideas. I expect there are others, because I know from
my previous jobs that there's always a balance between building
condiment-passing machines and just _passing the salt_. [1] Are there other
things which could be made better if only someone came up with the spare
time and resources to do the work?

If we are willing to have packages being signed, just mean they were built with koji, we could have a tool that could doing the signing so that packages could move from pending to testing or updates without human intervention and with the same key being used for all koji (non-scratch) builds, hard links could be used to save space on the mirrors for packages that appear in multiple repos.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux