On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:35:42PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Since tagger is now part of the compose process we probably want to start > doing only small, targeted changes. > > however, this is only the second day of beta freeze (not final). I've > reviewed the first four changes and they seem okay. The last one is larger > and more complex. All have already had signoff to merge into the upstream > repo. > > These are all UI changes, so at worst people wouldn't be able to add and > edit tags; it shouldn't affect the ability for tags to be pulled out of > tagger for use in the compose process. > > So I think updating ASAP would be okay but we should still try not to do > this in the future. > > -Toshio Adding further comment: the change is 'high impact' in the sense that it touches tagger which is now part of the compose process. It is 'low impact' in that it is mostly superficial UI changes. It is also low-urgency. It doesn't *need* to go in during the freeze. It can wait until after. I just made the announcement the other day and got an avalanche of bug reports -- this knocks off the low hanging fruit.
Attachment:
pgpM0aFIgT3q3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
