On 04/19/2013 04:12 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Today a bug was reported in fas. Symptoms are the first time someone trie to
> sign the FPCA it fails. A subsequent attempt will succeed. The reason is a typo
> in one code path through the fpca signing process. The fix is a simple
> correction of the typo and should be easy to revert if it causes unexpected
> problems.
>
> May I get two +1's to apply this as a hotfix?
+1, easy enough to revert it if something goes awry.
>
>
> diff --git a/fas/fpca.py b/fas/fpca.py
> index 198a1c6..7cf6a9c 100644
> --- a/fas/fpca.py
> +++ b/fas/fpca.py
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ def send(self, human_name, telephone, country_code, postal_address=None,
> person.apply(group, person) # Apply for the new group
> session.flush()
>
> - fas.fas.fedmsgshimshim.send_message(topic="group.member.apply", msg={
> + fas.fedmsgshim.send_message(topic="group.member.apply", msg={
> 'agent': person.username,
> 'user': person.username,
> 'group': group.name,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
