We're writing to this list because we think that Fedora and Arquillian share a common goal to see HyperKitty evolve. We can offer to hack on it and promote it if Fedora infrastructure would be willing to give us a space to run a public instance of it. (We're also Fedora users, of course).
We know about mm3test.fedoraproject.org, but we're hoping to be able to point discuss.arquillian.org at to the installation (CNAME support).
We plan to actively work on HyperKitty to improve the functionality and user experience. Therefore, we'd like to request a dedicated instance to give us the flexibility to experiment as much as needed without having to worry about disrupting the other lists running on it. In other words, we want to be bleeding edge for a while :)
Let us know whether this seems like a good fit. Although we are separate communities, I think the common goal of moving HyperKitty forward gives us good reason to work together. Plus, we're really eager to see HyperKitty get used for Fedora lists too.
Let us know whether this seems like a good fit. Although we are separate communities, I think the common goal of moving HyperKitty forward gives us good reason to work together. Plus, we're really eager to see HyperKitty get used for Fedora lists too.
-Dan
p.s. http://arquillian.org
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure