On 9 October 2012 01:09, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Couldn't see this in Infra SOP > > What criteria governs the Upgrading of major compenents of FedoraHosted > FedoraN+, Trac, *sql*, the underlying infra, > not the hosted projects themselves. Usually a security fix or upgrade of package in EPEL. To get them upgraded into EPEL it needs to show that upgrading to it won't break existing systems. If a break would occur then the package needs to be named appropriately (eg if trac-0.9 wont work with anything sooner then a package called trac09 needs to be created and put into epel. Then a test period of how we would update to that (how much downtime etc) would occur.) > -- > Regards, > Frank > "Jack of all, fubars" > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure -- Stephen J Smoogen. "Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it." Linus Torvalds "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
