Re: A small step towards for solving Ticket 1084

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:44:19 +0530
vipin kumar <vipinkumar41@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Team,
> The page is almost ready for reviews and feedback. Please have a look
> at following page and provide feedback.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Vipin

Awesome. :) 

Just a few minor nitpicks: 

- I'd just say we should remove any mention of pix firewalls or nat in
  the diagrams. In phx2 we are behind a firewall setup, but all our
  other sites are just directly on the net, and we don't control or
  have any knowledge of the phx2 firewall stuff anyhow. ;) 

- Might make the vpn lines bi directional. For app servers and such
  data travels back and forth both ways over the vpn for requests. 

- "Authorization can be done at Proxy Server though it should be done at
  application level for security reasons" Depending on what auth you
  mean here, it should always be done at the application level... when
  someone logs into FAS it is a request: proxy->fasserver and then they
  have a cookie that lasts for X minutes to authenticate against the
  various FAS using applications. Nothing should really auth on the
  proxy directly that I can think of... 

- For the 'data layer' in the last diagram, might note that that is
  mostly database servers. I guess in the case of the wiki it's also
  nfs storage (for attachements). 

Overall this looks great!

Thanks again for working on it. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux