On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:34:51 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:09:26PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I think this would be a good focus. We are looking at a 2 day > > work-fest (meaning many people would be block out 4 days (2 to > > travel, 2 to work)) and I think that would take up most of that 2 > > days. The next primary focus would be mapping what we have and how > > they talk to each other. Getting to know what is around and how it > > talks to everything is a time consuming task but once it is done, > > it makes figuring out what is left out in the wind, what we care > > about and what we don't much easier. > > > I've been thinking about the idea of having a FAD and I agree with > smooge about limiting the topics we're trying to achieve. I know > that my ability to finish projects at FUDCon has gone down over the > past few years because the number of projects that I'm involved in at > a given FUDCon has gone up. It seems to me that FADs are designed for > getting things done. So it would be great for us to focus on just > one project (example topic: security; example project: enable 2 > factor auth). If we have three days and we finish 2 factor in two > days, we can always decide to work on a new security-related project > then. Yeah, I think having that perhaps as a primary goal and listing other possible things as 'if we can get to them' might be best. One issue is that it might be 2 people are implementing something related to 2 factor and others have to wait for that to be done before they can do their part, they could work on something else. But I agree, we should try and focus... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
