On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:33:26 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 17:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > And that is the more or less it - does anyone have any > > suggestions/thoughts? > > You don't have to limit yourself to picking between user_u or guest_u. > You can create another role, such as "fedorauser_u" that is basically > guest_u, except you can then add specific policies via SELinux roles, > such as: > > irc_role(fedorauser_t, fedorauser_r) > > Which should let them run an IRC client such as irsii. > > On the other hand, just setting user_u is a good start and a lot less > work. Except it is more or less where we are now. ie: user can run stuff but they cannot put any exec or suid files in any place they can write. The debate is not about whether or not to enable this - it is about whether we need to allow network connections at all. Allowing irc out or ssh tunnels is not significant more safety over just allowing general network communication, afaict. -sv
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
