On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:45:40 +0530 > Kushal Das <kushaldas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > So, from my discussions with you on IRC, I think: >> > >> > We setup a single instance for this. >> > We put it behind our proxy servers to allow for some caching at a >> > local area level. >> I have a few questions on load balancing. Say if we have only one >> instance and it goes down for some reason, it will not get the records >> from koji during downtime. > > yeah. After talking on IRC with you it sounds like we are going to > change things so the koji plugin is the thing that directly talks to > the db, so it shouldn't result in any loss if the frontend is down. > >> So if we have a load balancer and more than 1 instance (say 2) , will >> the load balancer push all requests to the live instance ? >> If yes, then having a load balancer is a good idea. > > It would. > > Would this be useful for end users? Or would it be ok to have limited > downtime and they would just retry again later? For starting we can have only one instance. If we get enough requests saying the users/tool can not have downtime then we might move to load balancing. Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
