On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:02:52 -0800 Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for the note, much appreciated. :) > > I've copied the infrastructure team on this mail - hopefully they can > help out with this issue. I'm also curious about the issue with > Gnome Updater Tool - is infra aware of this as a known issue? I've mailed the admin of this mirror to ask them to look into things. I'm not aware of this PackageKit issue. Could someone perhaps file a bug on it and we can see about getting more attention on it? > Cheers! > > -Robyn kevin -- > On 03/05/2012 05:30 AM, John Mellor wrote: > > Hi Robyn, > > > > I'm not sure who is supposed to be managing the mirror table or the > > state of the mirrors, as there don't appear to be any docs on this > > important part of the Fedora infrastructure online. Can you pass > > this on to whomever is in charge of deciding the mirror sites? > > > > We need to get someone to either investigate why a particular pair > > of Fedora mirror sites have stopped mirroring. The following has > > been going on for weeks now, for all updates: > > > > http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm: > > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found : > > http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm > > Trying other mirror. > > ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm: > > [Errno 14] FTP Error 550 : > > ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm > > Trying other mirror. > > > > Its not fatal for non-gui command-line users, as the next mirror in > > the list is behaving properly and yum does the right thing, but its > > deadly for the graphical Gnome Updater Tool (which does not seem to > > use fallback sites [possible bug], and simply fails). The end > > result is that people who use the graphical update tools have been > > seeing no security and other updates for weeks now, which is pretty > > dangerous. > > > > If Nexicom has just broken their refresh mechanism temporarily, can > > we give them a heads-up about the problem? If they are now broken > > permanently, can we get it removed from the list? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > John Mellor > > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
