On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:59:53 -0500 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen (smooge@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > Discussion from irc today pointed out the..... difficulty with > > > > our security with prelink running on our systems. > > Is this a general issue that should be pushed up the stack? Well, I think it was more of: * prelink doesn't really buy us much on servers, which is all we run. Startup costs are not at all where we care. * When a new package is installed/updated on a server, prelink runs cause rkhunter to squak until someone manually updates them to say that that was ok. * I'm not sure prelink really buys us much in Fedora anymore either, but thats another discussion. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
