On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:44:55 -0800 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah -- if we have the package's app display a link (maybe from the > sources tab) to the gitweb that might just work. Alternately, the > only reasons to keep gitweb are 1) urls and 2) history. If the > packages application grows hstory viewing capability, perhaps that > would not be needed. Yeah, that could be the case down the road... but pointing to gitweb now might be fine. > > 2. move pkgs.fp.o to git.fp.o or to fedpkg.fp.o and let the new app > > take over the other urls. > > > There was a reason we didn't use git.fp.o... maybe mmcgrath would > remember better than me. I think it was pointed at fedorahosted for a while for some reason, so it was causing a lot of confusion after fedora switched to git for packages. ;( > fedpkg.fp.o would be slightly confusing since we have a fedpkg > package and becomes moreso if we move fedorahosted projects to > <appname>.fedorahosted.org domains. Agreed. I don't like that one. > If we do move the gitweb domain we'd be breaking the URLs into gitweb > which I know we wanted to avoid in the past... May be an opportunity > to move to cgit (I think that was the name) instead of gitweb, > though. That might solve our performance issues. We could look at it, but I thought it had it's own issues. Do we need to preserve links into gitweb? I would think if we provided a ok 404 type response most people would just go look at the top level and find what they are looking for. But perhaps I am not understanding how often people provide gitweb urls? > I'd love to hear more proposed names. So far, using the new app as > the entry point to gitweb and then using packages.apps.fp.o sounds > like the best plan but it also seems somewhat hacky. I agree. > We should talk about what other things we want to move from pkgdb into > the new community. As we talk about a projectwide shift in urls to > <appname>.apps.fedoraproject.org/, packages.apps.fp.o, and > pkgdb.apps.fp.o are also confusingly similar. We could aim to move > all of the pkgdb functionality into the new packages/community app. > Or we could make the new community app the front end to it similar to > how we're talking about for gitweb. Or we might want to rename in > some other way. Yeah, perhaps we could generate a list of all types of urls that pkgdb exposes now? admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb bugz.fedoraproject.org etc kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
