Re: serverbeach hardware refresh plans / hosted VFAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:55:58 -0500
seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1. I think we need some volunteer projects. Do we know of any
> enterprising folks who would like to be suckers.... err test subjects?

I'm sure we can find a few projects that wouldn't mind... 

> 2. For collab2 and hosted2 - would it be possible to run both of
> those secondary machines on one of the new sb boxes? Disk-space wise
> we should be able to make it work - and it from a failover standpoint
> it feels unlikely we would need to failover both hosted1 and collab1
> at the same time.

That possible, but it might hit I/O on that machine a bit hard. 
Depending on how we sync to those secondaries. 

> 3. Then do backups from collab2 and hosted2 - until we have our stuff
> together for hosted-tng.

Yeah, if we could get 2 to work that would work too probibly. 
More I/O tho. 

> > So, we can say, 'here's what we are going to change and why'. Then
> > we can get setup and start moving projects that opt-in, then have a
> > flag day before our migration window to just move everyone else. 
> 
> I suspect we'll need to waddle them all through a little at a time.
> Remember getting rid of cvs.fedoraproject.org? like that :(

Yep. Until flag day... 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux