On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:24, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:16 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Interesting test I saw this morning: >> >> http://everythingsysadmin.com/the-test.html >> >> I think we do pretty well overall, but there's some areas we could >> improve in. > > You're right, we don't do terribly on that list at all. > > We've gotten much better at remote processes and global changes. > > Some of our SoP's need to be updated but in general they are documented. > > I've thought a bit about the SoPs and I've been wondering - do we want > to move them OUT of the wiki and onto infra.fp.o? Well we could put them in with the CSI documentation and keep both up to date hand in hand. > I ask specifically b/c if our stuff goes sideways - recovering > infra.fp.o is a priority but we may not know HOW to without being able > to get to the wiki webserver, let alone the db. > > Just a thought... > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure > -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
