Re: puppet01 to lockbox01 migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:42, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> > Hmmm I was hoping we could resign systems and get rid of any mention
>> > of our old certificate puppet.fedora.phx.redhat.com (or whatever it
>> > thinks it is).
>> >
>> While I like both of these changes, I seem to recall when we renamed systems
>> to have "0" in the names we figured out that it's better to make one major
>> change at a time.  Makes it easier to test what could be broken and what's
>> not broken and makes it easier to troubleshoot the root cause of any new
>> issues.
>>
>
> +1million.
>
> 1. migrate to lockbox01.
> <once things work>
> 2. move stuff around
> 3. rename it all

OK sorry I didn't mean to make out I wanted to do everything at once.
We may have some issues with needing to call lockbox01 puppet1 for a
while before we rename things so that SSL will work.

> -sv
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux