On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 12:15 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:59, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:46 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:31, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 09:12 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > - an rsync module I wrote years ago would be useful for our epylog > >> >> > instance > >> >> > >> >> Yes. Stats from download* and hosted would be nice. Would show if one > >> >> of the machines was processing less, etc. > >> > > >> > I need to go find that rsync module. I think I know where it is. > >> > > >> > >> How does epylog work with httpd files? > > > > httpd logs in their own format - probably just 'meh'. > > > > httpd logs as syslogs might be a different story. > > > > but let's be clear - http logs were not within the original scope of > > what epylog was meant to do. > > I was trying to short cut looking at two different tools to figure out > how much is downloaded. However I can understand making this not a > feature. > >From what i can tell upstream is, if not dead, in a coma. If we want it, I'm pretty sure we can take it over w/o a lot of a fist fight. I'm just not sure if any of us have the time to spend on it properly. -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure