On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:57:57PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 09:14 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > > On 06/14/2011 08:33 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > > > *sigh* > > > > With respect, Dimitris, that kind of response isn't very helpful. It > > makes me feel that the exploration of alternatives is unwelcome. > > > > > Are there any specific concerns the Fedora translation community has > > > raised about the existing, proven infrastructure which weren't > > > addressed? Why do we need to test a new software? > > > > Because we do not yet know what Zanata might offer us compared to > > Transifex. Indeed, we can't and won't know that until we have a chance > > to try it out. > > > > We deflect all sorts of things precisely b/c "trying them out" is not a > zero-cost operation. > > So - we're trying to figure out why we would commit resources to > something if we don't have any thing to gain from it. In the case of Insight, many of the team members installed local sandbox copies (on our own laptops, for example) of various content frameworks so we could do these kinds of feature comparisons. Is that not possible with Zanata? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
