On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:38:55 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since we've been paring down unused services in infrastructure > recently, I'm inclined to wait for a need to arise/the translation > community to ask for a new service before deploying something new. > While theoretically someone in infrastructure could step forward to > sponsor a zanata testing instance onto publictest boxes, it doesn't > seem like a good use of time unless it addresses some need within > Fedora.... I agree. Some additional thoughts: * We do not have any other jboss applications, so this would be all new to us, additionally, I don't think any of our main sysadmins have too much jboss experence. Maven, java and other parts of this are all things we do not currently run, so would be increasing the burden on all of us. * It's not clear to me that everything is packaged up in a way we require. I'm sure there are jboss rpms, but is everything else packaged? * I would really like to see a consensus from the fedora translation groups that this is something they would like to persue. We have had a long and happy cooperation with the transifex folks, and it would be good to discuss any issues with them to see if they can be solved. * asking translators to move to another completely new setup seems difficult when they just moved to transifex.net (all be it similar software). So, I really think the next steps here are to talk with transifex.net folks and the fedora translation community and see if there are issues that cannot be solved that this move would help with. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
