On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 12:05 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > > alternative proposal: > > > > It does help make things clearer and much more "granular" but let's > > say one host has a minor difference in how the service is configured, > > we would have to accomodate the tweak somehow either by cloning a > > service definition and making the new definition specific to the host > > or by adding in extra modifications using another specification file. > > okay? and? We do that now, don't we? How is this different? > > > really, all I'm suggesting here is moving files around. > > okay - I've merged/mv'd the files in puppet master from servergroups to services and I've modified site.pp to reflect that. this is ONLY in master/production and it is DONE. I was starting to do it in staging and I thought "hmm, is now a good time to go ahead and move staging away from a branch and into main-line?" the plan here would be to take all the staging bits and move them into either separate class definitions and/or subdirs (for the config files) so that we don't ever have merge/cherrypick issues between the two branches. thoughts? -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
