> Â1. the distinction between servergroups and services is..... blurry. So if we wanted to spin up several load balancers we'd have first create a node definition for each balancer then add the proper services to the node definitions. This seems to be the reverse of what is done now with the host being assigned a servergroup which has services defined for what the "group" does. Am I incorrect in my understanding? If not, then there will probably be slightly more work involved to setup multiple hosts doing the "same" thing, no? > alternative proposal: It does help make things clearer and much more "granular" but let's say one host has a minor difference in how the service is configured, we would have to accomodate the tweak somehow either by cloning a service definition and making the new definition specific to the host or by adding in extra modifications using another specification file. I guess both seem equal to me but the enhanced granularity/readability of your proposal would probably help with self-documentation and managability. That is of course if my understanding of the setup is correct. :-) _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
