On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:25 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, here's the simple way I imagine: > > - new machines increment number. > - we setup CNAME aliases. > - CNAMEs change when new machine is placed in service. > > For example: > > We have a log01. We make a new log02, get it all setup, working, etc. > We have a 'collectd-server' cname that points to log01 > We have a 'syslog-server' cname that points to log01 > We have (optionally) a 'log-server' cname that points to log01. > > When changing things, we just change the cnames. Admins learn to login > to the cname and it always goes to the live one. Although that doesn't > help for puppet. > I am in favor of the above wholeheartedly - it is, implicitly, what I've been doing with the single-server instances - like people. we have people01 - which is accessed by people.fp.o or fedorapeople.org when people02 is happy it will be where people.fp.o points to. now - what about for services which have more than one machine backending them. if we have, for example, x86-01 -> x86-19 - which are builders - should we go to 20-25 and remove 01-06? or should we just replace and keep the same range. I don't mind either, I just want a decision on those. -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
