On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 08:37 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:27:40 -0400 > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:48 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > In looking at the differences between puppet names and nagios, seth > > > found a list of hosts with ?. I have added/cleaned up stuff with > > > many hosts checking for .vpn and not the canonical name. > > > > > > > two things pop to mind: > > > > 1. we start hitting all hosts directly - not via vpn > > For the nrpe access? > > I would think it would make sense to use direct for checking if a host > is up or down. (that way we could tell if it was vpn down/host up or > not). > > > 2. then we can refer to the boxes by their puppet-known names > > directly. > > Which nagios check needs to change? just the host up/down? well - I think the biggest change is to verify that noc01 can hit all the hosts if it is NOT using the vpn. -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
