On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Kevin and Stephen - thank you for the clarifications. These should be able to set the requirements/expectations if such a project is at all being considered as a GSoC idea. > If someone wished to make an application that does this, I would > suggest the following: > > * Make sure it grows an upstream community and is NOT just Fedora > Âspecific. This could be something other projects use and getting them > Âinvolved could add a lot of manpower. > > * To be more Fedora Infrastructure friendly, I would suggest avoiding > Âjava or ruby and look at python frameworks/solutions. > > * Make sure to have at least 2 people who know the code/can update/fix > Âthings around. If you only have one primary coder, and they aren't > Âavailable the app may be in trouble. > > * Offer to help test and setup instances and train infrastructure people > Âin how it works and how to manage it. The above probably needs to go under a page that is meant to be read by those requesting Infrastructure team to host (term strictly as per Stephen's definition) applications. > I do hope some folks will work on something like this... it looks like > it might have a good niche. :) Yes it does. In a way I believe this would have probably helped applications like FSoC take a different route for framework than the current RoR. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
